Here is presented the widely dismissed account that probably sometime in the mid-11th century, Danish Vikings from Schleswig and the Danelaw (as ascertained from runic rock inscriptions) arrived at Santos in
History is over...as an institution. Are you figuring out yet that it's all a charade? They could, by committee, downplay things like pyramids on 7 continents or the Kensington Runestone. But history is written clearly, accurately and indisputably in our genes. And new genomic studies tracking genomics over time and geography, show that pretty much every iota of American 'history' is a fantastic lie. Columbus discovered America in 1492. AND ALSO it's 53 million residents, a significant number who were black Africans. Nobody came across the Bering Strait 'over 1 million years ago', it was actually less than 1000 years ago. In fact the Vikings were sailing the St Lawrence river before the Delaware Indians settled there in the 1300s,. So no Indians, you haven't inhabited the land since your ancestors came down from the stars. You are the descendents of East Asians who came here in the second millennium and barely managed to survive the near genocide you all committed on yourselves over riches and spoils in the 12th and 13th century. It's fully detailed in your genome. So 'first nations', original inhabitants, silliness was all just a con you took and ran with. Everything is a lie, and they know it and this whole silly charade of fortifying their position with wacky tales of world traveling dogs should only prove to you how flimsy it all is. And that they know they're lying too. Anthropology is and always wAs about controlling YOU, and leaving you in an ignorant state so you are more easily controlled. Archaeology was always finding and hiding evidence they did not want you to find, before you found it and had questions. You know half of everything you see in museums is fake right? "But yeah we have the real one in the back room , we're just protecting it". This silly flimsy story has disconnected generations of humans from their true history and birthright. You know you always had questions if you thought about any of it too long. So glad to see all this nonsense starting to collapse on itself. Remember, KNOWLEDGE is not memorizing things other people tell you. SCIENCE is not just tempering all evidence against the thing you already believe , then accepting or dismissing accordingly. None of these people were never worth believing nor had even a shred of the credibility they tried to make you think they had. Excited to see this shitshow finally wrapping.
Interesting possibility. Another plausible theory is that there was Atlantean-era, fair-haired people who (probably exclusively) populated the world, to include the Americas, prior to the Ice Age. That entire culture, the world over, was of course destroyed rather suddenly, by something like bombs (Atlantis, the Levant, Indus Valley, China, etc.) or the deadly clouds they created, and via rapidly ensuing Ice Age, circa 115k BC (adding the zero back to Plato's timeline). The self-described black-headed (black-haired) people, the Sumerians, arrived much later, and began populating the world, with their dark-haired hoards soon after reaching all continents but Antartica, resettling the ruins, supplanting any Atlantean survivors. Those tunnels need to be fully explored, live-streamed to keep it transparent.
But that would not explain the known and traceable evidence pointing to relatively modern Norse viking presence there--the domesticated sheepdog bones the artifacts and the runes which mostly matches. Unless you're saying that somehow after being a completely lost civilization over 116k years before, that the Atlanteans somehow used the same old Norse language and runic inscriptions?
I'm not denying or ruling out past pre-diluvian civilizations including Atlantis, but the more solid evidence cited here as the controversial case in S. America, has nothing to do with your case and isn't a "diversion". It's simply following the emperical evidence that exists so far on the ground
Not all 'Atlanteans' (white, fair-haired) perished, as such people of the world today are proof of. The dark-haired migrants (aka "Native Americans") who came over crossing the Bering have their legends of the presence of a fair-haired/white people in small numbers, who were of course quickly supplanted. So that possibility is clearly established. If the Vikings came over later in boats, we should expect Native Americans to have their legends of white men arriving in boats. But the legends imply the white men were there already. And it is very unlikely that the Vikings could have built the boats and sailed over during near-peak glaciation, but maybe. One more possibility is that they could have used tunnel-cave system, which might connect to their mythical inner world, Agartha, whereby the commonality of Runes is easily explained. But getting people to see Lehman's 'iron core' theory (even though Newton, Halley, Euler - the best minds of their day believe Earth was a hollow shell) as a hoax it probably is ...isn't easy. But good dialog. Makes you think!
Not true,. Genomics has all but proven that the Vikings were here BEFORE many natives even settled their so called 'native lands'. It's basically inarguable. You can't have your grandmother's genes before your grandmother is born. The genomic chronology of 'Natives'' genomes is the strongest and most verifiable independent evidence available and makes all the 'accepted facts' look pretty embarrassed. The world is not 4 billion years old or even close. Humans are not a million years old or even close. Atlantis is a nice story, but science is about verifiable facts. Atlantis is gone but the truth of America's history is written plainly and repeatedly with perfect correlation in all of our genes. Let's see them try to talk their way out of this one...
Makes sense. The curve ball is that what they call the Vikings, should be called the Atlantean survivors, as with all fair-haired gentiles. DNA forensics, which can now determine skin, hair and eye color (crime labs do it all the time), have not yet been employed for these purposes. That should be the push, so we can find out what the oldest human remains REALLY looked like in the living flesh. Or sequence the DNA from the remains, then match up to the closest now-living person, and that tells you nearly everything.
History is over...as an institution. Are you figuring out yet that it's all a charade? They could, by committee, downplay things like pyramids on 7 continents or the Kensington Runestone. But history is written clearly, accurately and indisputably in our genes. And new genomic studies tracking genomics over time and geography, show that pretty much every iota of American 'history' is a fantastic lie. Columbus discovered America in 1492. AND ALSO it's 53 million residents, a significant number who were black Africans. Nobody came across the Bering Strait 'over 1 million years ago', it was actually less than 1000 years ago. In fact the Vikings were sailing the St Lawrence river before the Delaware Indians settled there in the 1300s,. So no Indians, you haven't inhabited the land since your ancestors came down from the stars. You are the descendents of East Asians who came here in the second millennium and barely managed to survive the near genocide you all committed on yourselves over riches and spoils in the 12th and 13th century. It's fully detailed in your genome. So 'first nations', original inhabitants, silliness was all just a con you took and ran with. Everything is a lie, and they know it and this whole silly charade of fortifying their position with wacky tales of world traveling dogs should only prove to you how flimsy it all is. And that they know they're lying too. Anthropology is and always wAs about controlling YOU, and leaving you in an ignorant state so you are more easily controlled. Archaeology was always finding and hiding evidence they did not want you to find, before you found it and had questions. You know half of everything you see in museums is fake right? "But yeah we have the real one in the back room , we're just protecting it". This silly flimsy story has disconnected generations of humans from their true history and birthright. You know you always had questions if you thought about any of it too long. So glad to see all this nonsense starting to collapse on itself. Remember, KNOWLEDGE is not memorizing things other people tell you. SCIENCE is not just tempering all evidence against the thing you already believe , then accepting or dismissing accordingly. None of these people were never worth believing nor had even a shred of the credibility they tried to make you think they had. Excited to see this shitshow finally wrapping.
Lol where are you getting this information? None of what you've said is true.
Interesting possibility. Another plausible theory is that there was Atlantean-era, fair-haired people who (probably exclusively) populated the world, to include the Americas, prior to the Ice Age. That entire culture, the world over, was of course destroyed rather suddenly, by something like bombs (Atlantis, the Levant, Indus Valley, China, etc.) or the deadly clouds they created, and via rapidly ensuing Ice Age, circa 115k BC (adding the zero back to Plato's timeline). The self-described black-headed (black-haired) people, the Sumerians, arrived much later, and began populating the world, with their dark-haired hoards soon after reaching all continents but Antartica, resettling the ruins, supplanting any Atlantean survivors. Those tunnels need to be fully explored, live-streamed to keep it transparent.
But that would not explain the known and traceable evidence pointing to relatively modern Norse viking presence there--the domesticated sheepdog bones the artifacts and the runes which mostly matches. Unless you're saying that somehow after being a completely lost civilization over 116k years before, that the Atlanteans somehow used the same old Norse language and runic inscriptions?
I'm not denying or ruling out past pre-diluvian civilizations including Atlantis, but the more solid evidence cited here as the controversial case in S. America, has nothing to do with your case and isn't a "diversion". It's simply following the emperical evidence that exists so far on the ground
Not all 'Atlanteans' (white, fair-haired) perished, as such people of the world today are proof of. The dark-haired migrants (aka "Native Americans") who came over crossing the Bering have their legends of the presence of a fair-haired/white people in small numbers, who were of course quickly supplanted. So that possibility is clearly established. If the Vikings came over later in boats, we should expect Native Americans to have their legends of white men arriving in boats. But the legends imply the white men were there already. And it is very unlikely that the Vikings could have built the boats and sailed over during near-peak glaciation, but maybe. One more possibility is that they could have used tunnel-cave system, which might connect to their mythical inner world, Agartha, whereby the commonality of Runes is easily explained. But getting people to see Lehman's 'iron core' theory (even though Newton, Halley, Euler - the best minds of their day believe Earth was a hollow shell) as a hoax it probably is ...isn't easy. But good dialog. Makes you think!
Not true,. Genomics has all but proven that the Vikings were here BEFORE many natives even settled their so called 'native lands'. It's basically inarguable. You can't have your grandmother's genes before your grandmother is born. The genomic chronology of 'Natives'' genomes is the strongest and most verifiable independent evidence available and makes all the 'accepted facts' look pretty embarrassed. The world is not 4 billion years old or even close. Humans are not a million years old or even close. Atlantis is a nice story, but science is about verifiable facts. Atlantis is gone but the truth of America's history is written plainly and repeatedly with perfect correlation in all of our genes. Let's see them try to talk their way out of this one...
Makes sense. The curve ball is that what they call the Vikings, should be called the Atlantean survivors, as with all fair-haired gentiles. DNA forensics, which can now determine skin, hair and eye color (crime labs do it all the time), have not yet been employed for these purposes. That should be the push, so we can find out what the oldest human remains REALLY looked like in the living flesh. Or sequence the DNA from the remains, then match up to the closest now-living person, and that tells you nearly everything.
Quick, hide the Vedic artifacts!
Below is a link to an accpunt of a viking ship in the Mojave desert.
http://the-wanderling.com/longship.html
When dealing with exceptional concrete, think Roman. This is a very old new world.