9 Comments
User's avatar
Davy Ro's avatar

It might be an insult to science as the 1st comment puts it. But science gets insulted by anyone who suggests anything other than main stream sciences explanations. This statement from the person above is suggesting our science knows everything & is correct about everything & any other suggestion is an insult. Which I find totally ridiculous personally. All of the ancient texts studied by science are labelled as myth. Are we seriously supposed to believe, ancient cultures who have built amazing structures. Many of which we would struggle or even couldn't replicate today. Only documented fantasy stories. Or are you labelled a sudo scientist for suggesting any other explanation? We have a lot of labelling placed on people nowadays, who have the courage to look & study things differently. I'm positive in the dark ages people were executed for suggesting the Earth travelled around the Sun & not visa versa. Today main stream science is finding through the James Webb telescope. This Big Bang theory isn't as water tight as they've been saying for the previous decades. Which isn't surprising considering it goes against fundamental laws of physics. Then again you'll always get those unwilling to have the courage to look at things from a different view. What happened to neanderthals? What blood type were they? What other types of hominids have walked this planet? How did we advance so much in such a short period of time? There's a lot more mystery to modern day humans than even our science can explain. Personally I think it's best to be open minded to all different possibilities. I'm positive in the late 1990's we were going to find out who our common ancestor was going to be. Through our new found geneoligy & DNA studies. I don't know about anyone else. But I haven't heard or seen the conclusive results of this.

Expand full comment
Sarah Rhabarber's avatar

Dankeschön, ich stimme dir zu.

Expand full comment
LadyHistorian's avatar

Give it a break. Rh-negative blood type is common in northern Europe. B blood type in South America. This fascination with extraterrestrials is an insult to science and the rational mind. Sources used from 1949– oh, gee, who didn’t much like Jews in those days, hmm?

Take a collegiate anthropology class and learn about migration routes as humanity spread around the globe.

Bottom line: evolutionary adaptations to environmental conditions, probably. Natural selection, definitely.

And in conclusion, the firstborn of positive and negative parents is okay, because the mixture of blood occurs during childbirth, so it is Subsequent children who are increasingly put at risk one after the other.

Expand full comment
Sarah Rhabarber's avatar

Fräulein Prysselius, hast du auch Jhesus negatives🤣 Blut?

Miss Prysselius, do you also have cheesus negative🤣 blood?

Expand full comment
SANDRA DECKINGER's avatar

There is a very small percentage of human beings that are born without a Rh factor.

Expand full comment
Billie Cotter Harris's avatar

I am RH negative.

Expand full comment
Johnathan's avatar

This post is littered with inconsistencies and all of the data is taken from the web which brings this whole post to absolute shit. Do better research and quit just finding opinionated scraps on the internet and determining they are the truth. Im rh- and my mother was too - both of us are clairvoyants, can even occasionally hear peoples thoughts, astral project easily and remote view with little to no interference.

Expand full comment
Laura Lanning's avatar

I am Rh positive and my mother is Rh negative. She almost miscarried me twice, got a shot, and went on to carry me to term, born healthy.

Expand full comment