By the way, I post weekly sci news at https://www.thunderbolts.info/forum3/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=26&p=8993#p8993. The news covers astronomy and "Earth Science", i.e. geology, archeology etc. My sources for the Earth Science are mainly these (& SOTT.com etc).

Creation . com (good science writing on the Flood, the Ice Age etc)


Institute for Creation Research (ditto)


Society for Interdisciplinary Studies


Graham Hancock Ancient News (recent articles he finds online)


Antonio Zamora's (Younger Dryas Impact etc, especially the Carolina Bays)


Ancient Architects Channel


UnchartedX Channel to Rewrite History (Advanced Ancient Tech etc)


Thunderbolts Project (sometimes has info on the Saturn Theory)


Brien Foerster's Ancient Tech Channel (mostly on megalithic Inca sites & Egyptian)


Mystery History's Ancient Tech Channel


Mystery History


Charles Kos (hasn't done anything for a few months, but has neat ideas)


Randall Carlson (He talks about the Younger Dryas & megafloods & Atlantis etc)



Phenomenal Travel Videos (Advanced Ancient Tech etc in India & S.E. Asia)


Shattered History (She agrees that Pangaea broke up recently)


Bright Insight's Catastrophism & Ancient Tech Channel (He agrees that Richat was Atlantis)


Expand full comment

I'm using a substack to write a book on Cataclysmic Earth History at https://cataclysmicearthhistory.substack.com/archive. I have maybe a dozen posts so far. I've been writing on the Thunderbolts.info forum for several years on similar topics. So I decided to look around to see if anyone else on Substack is discussing similar things. Glad to see there's this substack. I think this post of mine, PROOF SEDIMENTARY ROCK IS NOT OLD, may be the most eye-opening one at https://cataclysmicearthhistory.substack.com/p/1. It shows several reasons why sedimentary rock was surely deposited over a very short period of time, months. The popular writers on catastrophism, like Hancock, Carlson et al, need to see this evidence and stop imagining that civilization is hundreds of thousands or millions of years old. Those long ages are an illusion based on the imagined millions of years of deposition of sedimentary strata. The strata are divided into 3 main types: shale, limestone and sandstone. If each of those were deposited for millions of years, why did just one type get deposited for such long timespans? Where did just that one type come from? Etc. PS, I'm not saying civilization can't be older than a few thousand years, just that you can't base the dating of civilization on sedimentary rock strata. And the Flood mostly destroyed everything that existed before. Things found in coal and other sediments were deposited during the Flood and may show pre-Flood civilization, but there's likely no way to tell when such pre-Flood civilization began, so far.

Expand full comment

(there's no such thing as Dwarka)

Expand full comment

Atlantis = Richat Mauritania.

Aztlan & Cibola describe the same thing. Aztlan is one city of seven. They lie in:

1. Mt Shasta CA

2. Panamint Mts CA

3. San Pedrir Mt MX

4. Superstition Mts AZ

5. Hopi City of Dead, Grand Canyon AZ

6. Unknown

7. Unknown

Hope that helps or at least gives readers a direction to research. Cheers!

Expand full comment

One of these days, if science is willing to admit its current inaccuracies, answers to what happened to many of these cities will begin to appear. Despite all the textual evidence, and physical evidence to match, we keep turning a blind eye to what happened during the cataclysms of which we are even given a number.

Expand full comment

Looking like Recurring Solar Nova. Happens every 12600 years due to the solar systems position within the Galactic Current Sheet (dust clouds within the arms of the Milky Way Galaxy).

Expand full comment

I had posted a reply, but that was until I saw you support the Richat, conversation over, take care.

Expand full comment

@TRH. You give up fast. Maybe Erv is open-minded.

The Saturn Theory suggests that the original Atlantis was the Saturn configuration of planets close to ancient Earth in the sky (at the north pole). Randall Carlson argues that Atlantis was in the Azores, but I think that would have just been a copy of the Atlantis in the sky.

Expand full comment

There is a difference between giving up and saving yourself a headache. Erv made a statement that Atlantis is the Richat, not a theory, not a probability, a statement. Every Richat supporter I have spoken to is what I can only deem as borderline fanatical. In regards to open minded, I have one of the most open minded theories regarding the cataclysm events, and as mentioned above, a slew of physical evidence to support it, so i am afraid I cannot classify him in that grouping. I am not really concerned with what we cannot prove in outer space, I am focusing on what I can see and piece together here on earth.

Expand full comment

Cycles upon cycles, all based upon the Great Year (26000). Heinrich Bond Cycle is 6000 years (Noah’s Flood). To disconsider the Richat as Atlantis with the amount of data present is pretty ignorant. Until it is proven or disproven, it’s best to observe and not speak unless you have facts in hand. The truth is merely a human interpretation of the facts. Nothing more.

Expand full comment

I have a significant amount of physical evidence sir, and I did not read it in a book. But since it does not match what the people say in the books you read, and I have no degree's I obviously do not have a clue right sir? Icebergs, that is hysterical and partially resembles Hapgood's theory. The key to it all is the striations found all over the continent of Africa. Take care and best of luck in your "research".

Expand full comment

I hear you. Most of my research is on site as well. I do read books and attend lectures, but you cannot unequivocally confirm anything until you stand in the location yourself. Good luck!

Expand full comment

@Erv. The Earth was formerly in the Saturn system which originated outside the solar system, or at a great distance within the solar system. So the Great Year didn't start until Earth entered its present orbit, maybe 4,500 years ago. The Septuagint bible seems to say that the Great Flood occurred about 5,300 years ago, so that's close to your figure. The Richat structure is likely a natural phenomenon, formed catastrophically, probably during the Great Flood. I don't know of any evidence that it's artificial.

Expand full comment

I’ve been attending classes at seminary school. Go check out Mauro Biglino’s translations he did for the Vatican. He was fired 19 books in but it is some amazing stuff. “The Naked Bible”. No mention of God in that one. Just a tribe of men called Elohim who led man down some crazy paths on this earth in antiquity.

Expand full comment

Elohim = El =the first Sun = Saturn.

Expand full comment

The texts describing Atlantis (have to look up specifics) states that it was built upon a lava dome created by the gods. The Richat is an ancient volcano as far as I can tell. Pretty strange structure though. Hopefully one day some serious work will be done there. That’s an interesting theory on Saturn. I haven’t come across that but I’d like to see more. The galactic current sheet made waves in 2010 when a whistleblower from Boeing came out trying to warn the public about a classified briefing he attended with DOD. Ten years later Ben Davidson along with a bunch of science geeks and legitimate climate scientists and astrophysicists have been monitoring and kicking out peer reviewed papers on the subject. Definitely considered fringe science but a lot of well known folks support the data. The book is “Weatherman’s Guide to the Sun”

Expand full comment

@Erv. Where's info on a Galactic Current Sheet? All I've heard of is a Heliospheric Current Sheet. The arms of the galaxy might be current sheets. See http://qdl.scs-inc.us/?top=6031

Expand full comment