Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr. Simona L. Brickers's avatar

The story of the Renyin Plot is horrifying and haunting—not because the women failed, but because of what drove them to act in the first place.

History remembers Jiajing as sadistic: starving young girls for “alchemy,” beating concubines into submission, and consuming lives as though they were ingredients in his search for immortality. But what strikes me most is that his cruelty depended on silence. It depended on the assumption that these women could be erased, their suffering buried beneath the façade of imperial power.

Their attempted assassination was not just rebellion; it was testimony. A refusal to remain invisible. A declaration that the body has limits and will not endlessly absorb violence. Even when the plot failed, even when the punishment was brutal beyond comprehension, their act shattered the illusion of unquestioned authority.

In Chronically Under and Over Touched™, I write about how systems thrive on our muted grief and enforced numbness. The Ming court’s violence against women was not just personal cruelty—it was structural, designed to regulate intimacy, reproduction, and memory. And yet, even in that structure, resistance arose.

The Renyin women remind us that survival sometimes looks like transgression, like risking everything for a chance at freedom. Their act echoes across centuries: against emperors, against tyrants, against the machines of modernity that still try to extract our lives while calling it progress.

History’s record is often written by the survivors of power, not the survivors of violence. But in this case, the women’s defiance is what lingers. They remind us that silence is never the only option.

Expand full comment

No posts